What we publish about handling your documents.

Start with the maintained public policies, processor record, legal terms, and reporting contacts below. Deployment-specific architecture, control evidence, assurance scope, and questionnaire responses are provided through a qualified review. The published data processing agreement remains clearly labelled as a draft.

This page answers one question: what is published about security and document handling, and where to request a qualified review. How a citation stays bound to its source is on Evidence; what a result has to carry before it is published as a number is on Benchmarks; the frozen fixtures you can rerun are on Reproducibility; the open problems and the experiments that failed are on Research.

Customer names, figures and logos appear on this site only with that customer’s written sign-off on the exact wording.

The pages

Public trust resources

Published

Security controls

The Security page describes the customer-facing safeguards for document intake, workspace access, evidence, activation, retention, and deletion.

Open resource

Published

Privacy notice

The privacy notice explains the data categories, purposes, storage and transfer locations, retention, and verified access, export, and deletion requests.

Open resource

Published

Subprocessors

The subprocessor record names the third parties permitted to process customer data, their purpose, the data class, and the applicable location information.

Open resource

Published

Data processing agreement

A draft v2 data processing agreement is published for review and is clearly labelled as a draft, not a signed agreement.

Open resource

Published

Responsible disclosure

The reporting address and disclosure policy are published at the standard security.txt location.

Open resource

Qualified review

Qualified security review

Deployment-specific architecture, control evidence, assurance scope, and questionnaire responses are provided through an appropriate qualified review.

Open resource

What is in place, what is coming, and what is absent

Every row below is already stated on the page it links to; this is the same record in the order a security review asks for it. 9 in place · 1 on the roadmap · 8 absent.

What a reviewer asks forStateWhat is true today
Encryption in transitProvidedTraffic is encrypted in transit throughout. Security
Encryption at restProvidedStored objects are encrypted at rest by the storage provider, and service credentials remain on trusted server boundaries. Security
Workspace isolationProvidedIdentity and workspace membership are resolved server-side, and data access is scoped to the authenticated workspace and rechecked at protected operations. Security
Subprocessor recordProvidedEvery third party permitted to process account, document, billing or inquiry data is named with its purpose, the data class and the region it is configured to process in. Thirty days' notice of an addition or replacement, with an objection right, is written into the draft agreement. Subprocessors
Personal data breach notificationProvidedWithout undue delay and no later than 72 hours after becoming aware, with the nature, the categories and volume affected, the likely consequences and the measures taken. The service is operated by one person without a 24-hour rota, which is why the committed window is 72 hours rather than shorter. Data processing agreement (draft)
Deletion on a verified requestProvidedOn a verified deletion request, or on termination, the scope and outcome are confirmed in writing, and compiled worlds can be exported as signed packages first. A request may be limited or delayed by a legal hold or retention duty, and no fixed operational completion period is committed in the draft. Privacy notice
Restore drillProvidedOne drill is on record: on 2026-09-10 the production database was restored from its 2026-09-08 backup into a separate temporary project, the catalog of the original and the restored copy matched on all 431 objects, and the temporary project was deleted. It covered the database. It did not cover the document bytes in object storage, a full service recovery, or a run through the customer-facing application, and the receipt is available to a customer on request. Data processing agreement (draft)
Responsible disclosureProvidedThe reporting address, the policy and the preferred languages are published at the standard well-known path. security.txt
Architecture, control evidence and questionnaire responsesProvidedDeployment-specific architecture, control evidence, assurance scope and questionnaire responses are provided through a qualified review rather than published here. Contact
Signed data processing agreementRoadmapDraft v2 (2026-09-23) is published in full for review and is labelled as a draft, not a signed agreement. The clauses still open say so in place, and the standard contractual clauses are incorporated at signature. Data processing agreement (draft)
Customer-managed encryption keysNot providedEncryption at rest is the storage provider's. There is no customer-managed key. Data processing agreement (draft)
Roles, single sign-on and a seat modelNot providedAccess control is a workspace membership checked server-side on every request. The account that owns a workspace is the account that reaches it, and source-level access is enforced at the grain of the workspace rather than the member. Data processing agreement (draft)
Contractual data residencyNot providedThe database and the serverless functions are configured for Seoul and the object bucket carries an Asia-Pacific location hint, which is best-effort. One processor (RunPod) has no pinned region. Subprocessors
A stated retention periodNot providedMaterial stays until you delete it, until the workspace is deleted, or until a legal retention duty applies. No day count is established, and copies in provider backups age out under the provider's lifecycle. Privacy notice
Recovery point and recovery time objectivesNot providedNo recovery point objective, no recovery time objective and no backup retention period is committed. Objectives and a drill cadence are marked for the executed version of the agreement. Data processing agreement (draft)
Contractual uptime or resolution targetNot providedPublished plans include no contractual availability or resolution commitment. The published support target is an acknowledgement target rather than a resolution time, and Enterprise support terms are agreed during scoping. Pricing
Third-party assurance reportNot providedNo SOC 2 report, ISO 27001 certificate or independent penetration-test report exists yet. An external penetration test is planned after the first paying customer; SOC 2 timing is not set. The draft agreement's audit right is a real right to inspect controls, not a report that already exists. Data processing agreement (draft)
Self-hosted, private-cloud or air-gapped installationNot providedThere is one hosted deployment. No separate installation is offered on any scope. Pricing

Each row points at the page that makes the statement, and that page is where the wording is maintained.